iBench is a free and open source benchmarking application for running comprehensive benchmark tests on Macs. It contains 12 integer workload and 9 floating point tests which it uses to evaluate the memory subsystem and CPU performance of your computer.
Heaven Benchmark is a GPU-intensive benchmark that hammers graphics cards to the limits. This powerful tool can be effectively used to determine the stability of a GPU under extremely stressful conditions, as well as check the cooling system's potential under maximum heat output.
Benchmarking Tool For Mac
MAXON's Cinebench analyzes both your Mac's GPU and CPU with two simple tests. This tool has some pretty legit credentials, as popular movies like Iron Man 3 and Life of Pi have used MAXON software to create 3D graphics.
Therefore the only way to really make a judgement about the speed of the storage inside your Mac is to use a tool such as the BlackMagic Disk Speed Test, or the AJA System Test Lite (free from the Mac App Store here) to measure the read/write speeds of your hard drive or solid state drive.
UNIGINE Benchmarks is a unique benchmarking tool that is mainly focused on graphic card performance. With the benchmarking report, you can know exactly if you need to customize the machine or if it performs well enough.
NovaBench is a useful tool that can help pinpoint any inefficiencies which could potentially cause large problems. The tool is completely free and is quite fast because a report is returned to your screen in just a few minutes. You can compare the results of your machine with millions of other reports available on this program.
GFX Bench can be regarded as one of the top graphics benchmarking tools that are used to measure whether your Mac can handle graphic-deep programs. The tool uses gamelike simulations since games require the most graphic card power. After assessing the machine, a report detailing the capabilities of the computer will be generated right away.
iBench is a tool designed specifically for Mac computers and conducts different tests since it does not focus solely on the graphics card. Instead, the focus of iBench focuses greatly on the Central Processing Unit (CPU). The tool conducts more than 21 tests that vary to assess the true capabilities of the heart of your computer.
iBench also assesses the memory subsystem, which contributes to a holistic view of the performance of your Mac computer. Using iBench to assess a mac in conjunction with a graphics card benchmarking tool can yield better results.
Temperature Gauge is the perfect tool to assess the performance of the computer and avoid it experiencing overheat. The tool focuses on the onboard fans and cooling system whenever more computing power is needed. This prevents the computer from crashing due to overheating.
Regardless of what application you would like to use on your computer, there is a huge variety of tools that can be used to make sure it is ready. These Mac applications are perfect for assessing the GPU, CPU and a variety of other performance-related hardware, including the cooling system.
ab is a tool for benchmarking your Apache Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) server. It is designed to give you an impression of how your current Apache installation performs. This especially shows you how many requests per second your Apache installation is capable of serving.
Visit the EPA Energy Star site or use the tool below that lets you search by zip code to see whether or not the area utility company shares aggregate data. This will help owners get the tenant data they must provide for the assessment or for benchmarking.
iStat Menus is a tool for benchmarking performance that is surprisingly easy to use, with extra capabilities for controlling various features of your Mac, such as fans and battery. iStat Menus monitors real-time performance, showing speed and capabilities of CPU and GPU.
Apple has undoubtedly proved their M1s live up to expectations, but although benchmarking is super insightful, it won't actually speed your Mac up or increase performance. Jump to the next section, and I'll show you how do just that.
CPU benchmarks can help you gather information on the main things in your system, including the processor, memory, and more. There are many benchmarking tools designed to measure the general performance of your Mac, but one of the most popular is Geekbench 5.
With its pure DirectX 12 engine, which supports new API features like asynchronous compute, explicit multi-adapter, and multi-threading, Time Spy is the ideal test for benchmarking the latest graphics cards.
Mesh Shaders, a new feature in DirectX 12 Ultimate, give developers more flexibility and control over the geometry pipeline. The 3DMark Mesh Shader feature test shows how game engines can improve performance by using the mesh shader pipeline to efficiently cull geometry that is not visible to the camera. An interactive mode lets you experiment with different settings and visualization tools.
Sampler Feedback is a feature in DirectX 12 Ultimate that helps developers optimize the handling of textures and shading. The 3DMark Sampler Feedback feature test shows how developers can use sampler feedback to improve game performance by optimizing texture space shading operations. An interactive mode lets you experiment with different settings and visualization tools.
XeSS (Xe Super Sampling) is an Intel graphics technology that uses AI-enhanced upscaling to improve performance while maintaining high image fidelity. The 3DMark Intel XeSS feature test shows you how XeSS affects performance and quality. The frame inspector tool helps you compare image quality with an interactive side-by-side comparison of XeSS and native-resolution rendering.
Xbench was developed by Spiny Software to provide a comprehensive benchmarking solution for Mac OS X.Xbench is useful not only for comparing the relative speeds of two different Macintoshes,but also for optimizing performance on a single machine.Xbench is accompanied by a website that allowsgraphical side-by-side comparison of any out of thousands of submitted benchmarks.
The benchmark tools are available as benchmark apps for Android and iOS and asnative command-line binaries, and they all share the same core performancemeasurement logic. Note that the available options and output formats areslightly different due to the differences in runtime environment.
There are two options of using the benchmark tool with Android. One is anative benchmark binary and another is an Androidbenchmark app, a better gauge of how the model would perform in the app. Eitherway, the numbers from the benchmark tool will still differ slightly from whenrunning inference with the model in the actual app.
A convenient and simple C++ binary is also provided tobenchmark multiple performance optionsin a single run. This binary is built based on the aforementioned benchmark toolthat could only benchmark a single performance option at a time. They share thesame build/install/run process, but the BUILD target name of this binary isbenchmark_model_performance_options and it takes some additional parameters.An important parameter for this binary is:
Internal events from the TensorFlow Lite interpreter of an Android app can becaptured byAndroid tracing tools.They are the same events with AndroidTrace API, so thecaptured events from Java/Kotlin code are seen together with TensorFlow Liteinternal events.
Among different options for capturing traces, this guide covers the AndroidStudio CPU Profiler and the System Tracing app. Refer toPerfetto command-line toolorSystrace command-line toolfor other options.
Internal events from the TensorFlow Lite interpreter of an iOS app can becaptured byInstrumentstool included with Xcode. They are the iOSsignpostevents, so the captured events from Swift/Objective-C code are seen togetherwith TensorFlow Lite internal events.
In order to test and troubleshoot networks we need tools that allow us to generate network traffic and analyze the network's throughput performance. This is true for both wired and wireless networks. We focus strictly on 802.11 (WiFi) networks because analysis tools are relatively scarce or, when available, tend to be rather expensive and overly complex to use. Also, because WiFi networks are sensitive to RF interference from other wireless devices, they are more difficult to troubleshoot and transient changes in the local environment may affect their performance. Tools that are typically used to troubleshoot wireless networks report signal strengths of RF interference or beacons from an access point in units of dBm or RSSI (relative signal strength indication). But what do these really mean? How do these translate in terms of the performance of your wireless network?Our wireless network adapter may report the beacon strength of our access point to be -53 dBm or -65 dBm or -73 dBm or . Or, our RF spectrum analyzer displays a -74 dBm interference peak in the middle of channel 6. Or, we and our neighbor or the business next door have our access points configured to use channel 11? Is this good? Bad? Doesn't matter? Ultimately, the bottom line and what we care about most is throughput -- that is, how many bytes-per-sec can be transferred from one node on the wireless network to another. The dBm and RSSI numbers don't mean much if you can't somehow relate them to a performance metric -- the most relevant being 'bytes / sec'. In order to properly troubleshoot a wireless network we need a way to benchmark its performance, so as modifications are made we can determine whether or not they really make a difference in the network's performance.This is where NetStress fits in. It's a simple tool, originally created for our internal use, which we later realized would also be of value to others. Here's the ideal scenario: You install a new wireless network and it works perfectly. Run NetStress and record the benchmark results for later reference. Sometime in the future when either you or others suspect performance has declined then run NetStress again and compare the latest results with those you gathered when the network was first installed and working "perfectly". The results of that comparison will indicate whether or not there really is a problem and dictate which steps to take next (if any). Regardless of your technical expertise or how expensive your diagnostic tools, if you are modifying a wireless network or making decisions to modify it and you are not testing throughput then you risk wasting time and resources going down the wrong path. 2ff7e9595c
Comments